True Qualitative and Quantitative Reporting begins with multi-dimensional scoring that provides a true assessment of the students knowledge and skills.

In knowledge-based binary reporting, all you know is if the student answered the question correctly or not. Skills-based binary reporting only indicates whether the flag was captured or not. Ranking is flat, excellence is invisible and worse, mediocrity is rewarded.

CyberQ’s Q/2 scoring and reporting begins with:

Binary (was the flag captured/was the question answered)
Time ? how long
Traffic generation ? how much traffic was generated to complete the task
IDS ? how many intrusion alerts were triggered to complete the task
Service functionality ? impact on critical network services

In version 1.0, CyberQ will also:

Use Common Vulnerability Scoring System
Third party, published metrics for attack difficulty
Change target scores over time to reflect patches, weaponization of attack
scripts, etc.
Transparent and descriptive target rating
Add in optional player demographic data allowing you to compare performance
based on age, education, certification, etc.
Include target reporting